|
May 15th, 2008
On May 14th, Governor Schwarzenegger released his May Revision to the 2008-'09
budget proposal. While backing away from suspension of Prop.98, which ensures
minimum levels of funding for schools, the revised proposal still contains
over $4 billion of cuts in school funding for
2008-'09.
The budget is far from agreement in Sacramento, with both Republican and
Democratic party leaders rejecting the Governor's proposals shortly after their
release.
While the exact impact on Alameda's school district is still being determined,
it's likely we still face a budget cut comparable to that which was proposed
in January.
Reaction from Bill Schaff, Keep Alameda Schools Excellent, Yes on H:
"Alamedans cannot afford to gamble with the Governor's revised plan to fix
the budget crisis. While it appears to meet requirements under Prop 98, the
revised budget is a shell game, leaving our schools the biggest loser. Without
final numbers, which are several weeks away, and continued rhetoric from
Sacramento, we still must anticipate a $4 million hit to Alameda schools. The
only way to protect our children is to pass Measure H on June 3rd."
From Luz T. Cazares, Chief Financial Officer,
Alameda Unified School District:
"The budget battle is far from over and we should not be fooled by the 'sound
bites' coming from Sacramento. The Governor's latest proposals are risky and
controversial at best. The only responsible thing that AUSD can do at this
point is to continue with our own budget development process and the spending
reductions we have put in place. We don't believe that the Governor has
fixed anything with his May budget revision."
From Ardella Dailey, Superintendent,
Alameda Unified School District:
"The Governor's current budget proposal is about as risky as saying that I
can build the school district's budget based on winning the lottery. What
are my chances of that?"
From State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Jack O'Connell:
"To say that education is fully funded in this budget is an overstatement...
Schools still must absorb the 10 percent cut made to specific programs like
class size reduction, counselors, and targeted remediation programs. These
cuts remain in today's proposal and have real-world impact on our students...
the failure to fund a cost-of-living adjustment amounts to a serious budget
cut in practical terms."
From the
San Francisco Chronicle:
"Funding would drop by 8.8 percent... the governor would cut programs and
withhold a cost-of-living increase. He is also proposing a ballot measure to
end public education's guaranteed 35 percent share of state lottery revenue
and freeze its future share at the dollar amount it received this year -
$1.2 billion... schools and programs would not escape deep cuts. Elementary
class sizes would swell, and many other programs - including class-size
reduction, classes for academically gifted students, adult education and
professional development for teachers - would be cut."
From the
California State Assembly Budget Committee:
"$4.3 billion in cuts to education, similar to what was proposed in the
January budget... Continues to not provide a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA)
to any K-12 program... Continues the same level of across-the-board cuts for
most K-12 programs that were proposed in January"
|